<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Argument Against a New Cell Phone Law&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pdxsucks.com/2009/02/23/the-argument-against-a-new-cell-phone-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pdxsucks.com/2009/02/23/the-argument-against-a-new-cell-phone-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:31:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertWagner</title>
		<link>http://pdxsucks.com/2009/02/23/the-argument-against-a-new-cell-phone-law/comment-page-1/#comment-607</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertWagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdxsucks.com/?p=793#comment-607</guid>
		<description>Definitely. Last time I tried to get on I-5 by the S. Waterfront I was behind a woman on the phone (yes, in a Volvo 740DL) that didn&#039;t seem aware that the speed limit had increased past 10mph. Aggravating? Oh hell yes. Perhaps a device that displays a large LED sign on the back of a vehicle when someone is on the phone that just relays the conversation to the people behind the car in question - that way, if we all have to drive like shit and dead ass slow, at least we&#039;ll have something to read and laugh at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely. Last time I tried to get on I-5 by the S. Waterfront I was behind a woman on the phone (yes, in a Volvo 740DL) that didn&#8217;t seem aware that the speed limit had increased past 10mph. Aggravating? Oh hell yes. Perhaps a device that displays a large LED sign on the back of a vehicle when someone is on the phone that just relays the conversation to the people behind the car in question &#8211; that way, if we all have to drive like shit and dead ass slow, at least we&#8217;ll have something to read and laugh at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://pdxsucks.com/2009/02/23/the-argument-against-a-new-cell-phone-law/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pdxsucks.com/?p=793#comment-605</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t they just tax talking on the cell phone while driving? I mean, sure you can do it for free whilst walking up and down Hawthorne avoiding those goddamned canvassers... but if you&#039;re driving, tax tax tax! Maybe hook up some huge boat-anchor of a device to the cell-phone to make it extremely awkward (and obvious) that you&#039;re texting while driving. In addition, I think maybe people should just tax those old fucks who try to get on the onramp to the I-5 at 15mph and interrupt my cell-phone conversation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t they just tax talking on the cell phone while driving? I mean, sure you can do it for free whilst walking up and down Hawthorne avoiding those goddamned canvassers&#8230; but if you&#8217;re driving, tax tax tax! Maybe hook up some huge boat-anchor of a device to the cell-phone to make it extremely awkward (and obvious) that you&#8217;re texting while driving. In addition, I think maybe people should just tax those old fucks who try to get on the onramp to the I-5 at 15mph and interrupt my cell-phone conversation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
